One of Microsoft’s top execs just explained why no one should work for Microsoft

Something is afoot when IT businesses begin to speak the truth about their practises.

It’s down, actually.

if they need to expose their hearts, emit portents of sorrow, and blast gongs of woe, you truly need to be concerned about the world’s precarious position

That’s how I felt when I heard Microsoft’s gloomy predictions.

Doesn’t mean that Microsoft is concerned about their product not being a worldwide standard for computers or tablets or whatever it is meant to be. As a result, Microsoft is concerned that it won’t be able to accomplish it.

The Great Resignation isn’t the subject of this COVID-induced moaning.

Because of this, Microsoft’s CEO Brad Smith said Reuters, there is the concern that Microsoft may have to pay its employees a significant sum of money.

When I say that, I’ve gotten a little ahead of myself.

His concern is that the pool of persons looking for work is getting smaller. In order to attract and keep employees, firms will have to bend and squat.

Paying your workers a lot of money is one of the best methods to accomplish this goal. Of course, they aren’t the best. Companies like to pay their workers the bare minimum in exchange for the highest potential output.

That might get out of hand if the ability to work where and how much you want becomes more widely available.

According to Smith, fresh people joining the workforce and growing the population are dwindling with time.

“That explains in part why sluggish growth may coexist with a labour shortage at the peak. Fewer people are joining the workforce than in previous years “he informed me.

Adults nowadays are choosing to have fewer children for many different reasons. Some of these problems may be the result of businesses abusing their position of power in order to accrue enormous profits at the expense of providing their workers with a fair standard of living.

Two-breadwinner households became the norm for many more families. Also, governments didn’t exactly promote the birth rate. In the absence of paid maternity leave, why would you have the three children companies require you to have to keep their labour expenses down?

Think about the world that Smith envisions.

Even at Microsoft, no one will desire a career there. Companies will have to pay their workers more and more, as Smith himself concedes. The competition for skilled workers is only going to get more intense.

Because of this newfound flexibility in terms of pay and time off, employees are less motivated to pursue a long-term career. More thrilling for them, they can now feel productive and joyful without feeling indebted to any one company or type of employment. This is a huge relief for them.

At this moment, I’m hesitant to bring up LIV Golf, but I’m feeling weak. To recap, a new golf circuit is paying players only to show up, offering them bigger prize money, shortening events, and catering to golfers’ need for more free time to, who knows, generate more money by inventing their own whiskey brands and hunting clothing. This is problematic.

The Saudi Arabian government is subsidising LIV Golf. This is a disturbing source of funding. But its ideas, no matter how perverted, may still be relevant for decades to come in the corporate employment market.

So why take a chance? Why put up with a boss you don’t like at work? What’s the point of working all your life if you can do other things worry-free? Why not get paid only to show up for a few months or even a few years?

For businesses, it’s a real problem.

The reason many people make such large investments in robotics is precisely this.

They don’t desire holidays, children or big salary hikes, and robots don’t care about them.

Not quite yet, anyhow.